Current:Home > BackStanding Rock: Tribes File Last-Ditch Effort to Block Dakota Pipeline-DB Wealth Institute B2 Expert Reviews
Standing Rock: Tribes File Last-Ditch Effort to Block Dakota Pipeline
View Date:2024-12-23 19:32:30
This story was updated at 2.00 a.m. ET on February 16, 2017 to reflect news events.
Native American tribes have filed yet another legal motion seeking to halt construction of the Dakota Access pipeline. Legal experts said the attempt faces long odds but may be the tribes’ best hope for blocking the project.
The motion, filed Tuesday by the Standing Rock and Cheyenne River Sioux tribes, asks the court to reverse an easement for the pipeline that the Army Corps of Engineers granted. That easement lifted the final hurdle for the project’s completion.
The tribes said the Corps’ actions violate the National Environmental Policy Act and the Corps’ responsibility to protect the tribes’ treaty rights. They called the decision “arbitrary, capricious, and contrary to law.”
The move is the latest in a long and twisting legal battle and protest movement to block the project’s Missouri River crossing under Lake Oahe, which skirts the Standing Rock Sioux reservation. The tribe says the pipeline threatens its water supply and sacred sites. In the final weeks of the Obama administration, the Army Corps declined to issue the final easement for the pipeline, saying it would conduct an environmental impact statement and would consider rerouting the pipeline.
One of Donald Trump’s first actions as president, however, was to order a reversal of the decision and swift approval of the project. Last week, the Corps issued the easement for the Lake Oahe crossing without producing an impact statement. The pipeline now may be just weeks away from completion.
The tribes have had little success in their legal attempts to block construction, said Patrick A. Parenteau, a professor at Vermont Law School.
“It’s already knocked them back a few times. It’s never a good sign when you keep losing,” he said. But Parenteau said the motion contains the best arguments the tribes have put forward.
“The strongest possible argument is that the Trump administration, with no change in facts, no change in conditions, reversed the government’s position,” he said. “As the federal government, you told this court in December you had a legal obligation to do a full environmental impact statement. Now you’re telling me you don’t. Why?”
Courts generally grant agencies substantial deference on how to proceed under the environmental policy act, said Wayne J. D’Angelo, an energy and environmental lawyer with Kelley, Drye & Warren, which makes the tribes’ argument unlikely to succeed. “They’re throwing everything against the wall,” he said. “The filing reflects the last of the plaintiffs’ actions for court intervention here.”
The tribes’ best hope may be that the Corps gave no substantive explanation for why it reversed itself, said Keith Benes, a former State Department lawyer who’s now a consultant and a fellow at Columbia University’s Center on Global Energy Policy. “Courts say an agency can change their mind about something, but courts also say that an agency has to give a reason,” he said. “By doing what it did, the Army really strengthened the case that the tribes had.”
On Monday, a federal district judge denied a separate attempt by the Cheyenne River Sioux to grant a temporary restraining order after the tribe argued the pipeline could pollute water that it uses in religious ceremonies. While the judge decided not to halt construction, that case will proceed and the judge said he would rule on the merits of the challenge before oil begins to flow.
The pipeline, which is being built by Energy Transfer Partners, has triggered ongoing protests led by tribal groups. While most demonstrators have left the site of the main protest encampment in North Dakota, a few hundred remain. Earlier this month, the Corps told tribal leaders that it would begin clearing the protest site because of safety concerns and the risk of floods. This week, as warm temperatures have prompted rapid snowmelt, state officials warned that flooding could contaminate nearby rivers with garbage and waste that protesters have left behind. On Wednesday, North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum ordered protesters to vacate the federal land by Feb. 22.
The easement being protested would cover a short section of the pipeline, most of which has already been constructed. This week’s filing represents one of the tribe’s last options for blocking the project. A ruling is expected quickly, but could be appealed.
D’Angelo said that while he expects the judge to deny the motion, there’s little legal precedent for how and when a new administration can shift course on a decision like this.
“There’s not a ton of case law out there on it,” he said. “I think how courts view these policy shifts back and forth is interesting, and this is an important issue.”
veryGood! (44693)
Related
- After entire police force resigns in small Oklahoma town, chief blames leaders, budget cuts
- House Republicans vote to rebuke Kamala Harris over administration’s handling of border policy
- OpenAI tests ChatGPT-powered search engine that could compete with Google
- Taylor Swift's BFF Abigail Anderson Is Pregnant, Expecting First Baby With Charles Berard
- Roster limits in college small sports put athletes on chopping block while coaches look for answers
- Jennifer Aniston hits back at JD Vance's viral 'childless cat ladies' comments
- Former Kentucky lawmaker and cabinet secretary acquitted of 2022 rape charge
- Fewer Americans file for jobless claims as applications remain at elevated, but not troubling levels
- 4 arrested in California car insurance scam: 'Clearly a human in a bear suit'
- How Kristin Cavallari's Inner Circle Really Feels About Her 13-Year Age Gap With Boyfriend Mark Estes
Ranking
- Volunteer firefighter accused of setting brush fire on Long Island
- Booties. Indoor dog parks. And following the vet’s orders. How to keep pets cool this summer
- Massachusetts governor signs bill cracking down on hard-to-trace ‘ghost guns’
- 'It's just a miracle': Man found alive after 14 days in the Kentucky wilderness
- Jana Duggar Reveals She's Adjusting to City Life Amid Move Away From Farm
- Biden signs bill strengthening oversight of crisis-plagued federal Bureau of Prisons
- Morial urges National Urban League allies to shore up DEI policies and destroy Project 2025
- Back-to-school shopping 2024 sales tax holidays: Tennessee, Florida and Ohio next up
Recommendation
-
Watch out, Temu: Amazon Haul, Amazon's new discount store, is coming for the holidays
-
Pregnant Lea Michele Reveals How She’s Preparing for Baby No. 2
-
West Virginia is asking the US Supreme Court to consider transgender surgery Medicaid coverage case
-
Spicy dispute over the origins of Flamin’ Hot Cheetos winds up in court
-
Mark Zuckerberg Records NSFW Song Get Low for Priscilla Chan on Anniversary
-
Smuggled drugs killed 2 inmates at troubled South Carolina jail, sheriff says
-
2024 Olympics: See All the Stars at the Paris Games
-
Cleansing Balms & Oils To Remove Summer Makeup, From Sunscreen to Waterproof Mascara